The Court is called upon to impose sentence on Rajat K. Gupta, who on June 15, 2012, was found guilty by a jury of one countof conspiracy and three counts of substantive securities fraud, in connection with providing material non-public information to RajRajaratnam. Federal law requires a court to state, not only orally but in writing, its reasons for imposing a sentence “different from”a Guidelines sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2). See also United States v. Rattoballi, 452 F.3d 127, 128-29 (2d Cir. 2006). This willbe a non-guidelines sentence, and, accordingly, the Court will both read this Sentencing Memorandum in open court and docket it promptly thereafter.
Click here for full details.